Post by Admin on May 5, 2016 8:38:30 GMT
My area of interest and investigation is foundation of quantum mechanics. Normally this area is treated as 'interpretations' since an interpretation does not provide proposals for new outstanding experiments. I suggest this is a false formulation. 'New experiments' are not so easy to formulate and provide, an enourmous work is necessary to develop the basic concept. This work to be done, many coworkers are necessary. For these coworkers to happen, some discussion area is necessary, and present-day physiacal magazines refuse to provide such an area. It is a very efficient and self-excusing strategy of mainstream physicists to belieave themselves and make others believe that new theorists are just ignorant and try to invent a byke. Say, 90% of special & general relativity 'subverters', yes, trivially misunderstand the Morley experiment, still 10% formulate very careful and elaborated concepts, which do not brutely 'disprove' relativity. Instead, they provide an intricate new look which potentially brings standard relativity plus something else, which is pretty subtle. Still, modern mainstream phisical society prefers to behave like Chekhov's man in a case, - to interpret situation as if all new interpreters provide very crude and ignorant theories. This is abnormal, and if fact this destroys the very spirit of true science.
Me and some my co-thinkers believe the hidden time concept is not just an 'interpretation' but a platform to build a future sub-quantum physical theory. In its spirit it has very much in common with Quantum Loop Gravity theory. But no heavy math is yet provided - with understandable concequences for 'serious' community. Still The basic idea is simple: space and time and not 'God - given' axiomatic entities but instead an emergent phenomena.
The concept, in my formulation, shortly sounds as follows. To disentangle the weird formulations of quantum theory, we should:
1. rely on Feynman's 'integration of many paths' formulation of quantum mechanis;
2. rethink the notion of physical time; we must make a theory such a way that the physcial time gets strictly defined in terms of some fundemental experimental procedure;
3. it is not so that elementary irreversible events (say, photon emissions and absorptions) 'happen in' space-time; instead, these events constitute space-time;
4. treat elementary events as an effect of self-organization of sub-quantum matter, which happens in some 'hidden' (internal, unobservable) time (and space); the phisical time consists of accomplished events and is not the same as hidden time; the theory provides a 'sewing procedure' to put hidden time and phisical time into regular compliance.
I have published the following papers on hidden time concepts at arxiv.org:
arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+Kurakin/0/1/0/all/0/1
These may be quite raw, of course. A popular introduction is here:
www.automatesintelligents.com/labo/2005/jan/bees.html
Basically, hidden time is the logical development of John Cramer's TIQM (Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics)
www-users.york.ac.uk/~mijp1/transaction/TI_toc.html
Also, the hidden time concept is very relative to Cybernetic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics:
www.mysearch.org.uk/website1/pdf/615.1.pdf
Me and some my co-thinkers believe the hidden time concept is not just an 'interpretation' but a platform to build a future sub-quantum physical theory. In its spirit it has very much in common with Quantum Loop Gravity theory. But no heavy math is yet provided - with understandable concequences for 'serious' community. Still The basic idea is simple: space and time and not 'God - given' axiomatic entities but instead an emergent phenomena.
The concept, in my formulation, shortly sounds as follows. To disentangle the weird formulations of quantum theory, we should:
1. rely on Feynman's 'integration of many paths' formulation of quantum mechanis;
2. rethink the notion of physical time; we must make a theory such a way that the physcial time gets strictly defined in terms of some fundemental experimental procedure;
3. it is not so that elementary irreversible events (say, photon emissions and absorptions) 'happen in' space-time; instead, these events constitute space-time;
4. treat elementary events as an effect of self-organization of sub-quantum matter, which happens in some 'hidden' (internal, unobservable) time (and space); the phisical time consists of accomplished events and is not the same as hidden time; the theory provides a 'sewing procedure' to put hidden time and phisical time into regular compliance.
I have published the following papers on hidden time concepts at arxiv.org:
arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+Kurakin/0/1/0/all/0/1
These may be quite raw, of course. A popular introduction is here:
www.automatesintelligents.com/labo/2005/jan/bees.html
Basically, hidden time is the logical development of John Cramer's TIQM (Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics)
www-users.york.ac.uk/~mijp1/transaction/TI_toc.html
Also, the hidden time concept is very relative to Cybernetic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics:
www.mysearch.org.uk/website1/pdf/615.1.pdf